· Essay · 6 min

Another Horse Is Dead in Central Park. Enough.

Deniz collapsed on June 9th — the seventh horse incident in thirteen months. The mayor finally agrees the carriages have to go. So why, in 2026, is this still legal?

By Michael Magee, PhD · NYC

Deniz was a sixteen-year-old gelding, and on Tuesday, June 9th, he collapsed near West Drive and 72nd Street and died on the ground in Central Park while tourists stood and watched. His caretaker said there had been no warning — that the horse had been eating and drinking normally, that a veterinarian had pronounced him fit back in March. The union that represents the drivers called it a sudden, catastrophic medical emergency. A necropsy is being done at Cornell. And I want to be careful here, because by every account the man who cared for Deniz loved him, and is grieving him, and that grief is real.

But the question on the table was never whether one driver loved one horse. The question is whether a city in 2026 should still be hitching half-ton prey animals to carriages and running them through Midtown traffic, on asphalt, in the heat, for the amusement of people on their honeymoons. And the word the union keeps reaching for — sudden — is doing an enormous amount of work. There is nothing sudden about a sixteen-year-old body breaking down under a job it was never built to do. The only thing sudden is the moment the rest of us are forced to look.

And we keep being forced to look. The Central Park Conservancy — which spent years studiously neutral on all of this — counts seven horse-related incidents in the park in the last thirteen months alone. A carriage overturned just last month when a horse spooked. In 2022 it was Ryder, who went down on a Manhattan street and was euthanized months later, and whose name is now on the very bill that keeps not passing. How many times do we have to watch a flight animal go down on the pavement before we concede that the pavement was always the problem?

Here is the part that makes me want to put my head through a wall. The argument is already over. I wrote on this site back in April that the carriage fight stopped being an evidentiary dispute a long time ago — the welfare case is, by any honest reckoning, settled — and that what kept it losing was a frame: jobs and heritage on one side, a moral abstraction on the other. That essay was meant to be strategic. Patient. Coalition-minded. And then Deniz died in the park, and patience feels obscene. We are not short on evidence. We have never been short on evidence. We are short on the political nerve to act on what we already know.

So let me say the thing plainly, exasperation and all: it is 2026, and New York City still licenses sixty-eight horse-drawn carriages to work its streets, and a horse just died in Central Park, again, and somehow this is still legal. That sentence should embarrass us.

What is new — and I will give credit where it is due — is that the politics have finally, belatedly, started to move in the right direction. Mayor Mamdani came out the day after Deniz died and said plainly that he supports getting the carriages out of Central Park. "Many New Yorkers were disturbed by what they saw yesterday," he said, "and I'm one of them." That is a sitting mayor of New York saying the quiet part out loud, and it matters. The Central Park Conservancy has dropped its long neutrality and now backs a ban outright. A 2025 poll put public support for ending the trade at seventy-eight percent. Philadelphia's City Council banned carriage horses outright. The coalition I kept insisting we needed to build? It is, suddenly, mostly built.

Which means there is exactly one thing left to do, and it has a name. Pass Ryder's Law. Council Member Christopher Marte reintroduced it at a City Hall rally the day after Deniz's death, the same bill that died in a health-committee vote back in November because the political will wasn't quite there. The will is here now. The mayor is here now. The public has been here for years. To the extent that a single horse's death can ever mean anything, let it mean that this was the time the Council finally stopped flinching and voted.

And please — spare me "tradition." A practice is not sacred because it is old; it is merely old. We ended plenty of old things once we were honest about what they cost. The carriages are not heritage; they are a postcard we keep paying for in animals' lives, and the postcard was never worth it. Montreal figured this out. Paris figured this out. Salt Lake City, of all places, figured this out. The horse does not care about your wedding photo. The horse cares about not dying in harness on a Tuesday.

Deniz deserved a pasture and an old age. He got West Drive and a necropsy. The least — the very least — this city can do is make sure he is one of the last, and not merely the most recent. Pass the law. Retire the horses. End it.

Sources & Further Reading

  1. Zanger, J., & Kramer, M. (2026, June 10). Push for NYC horse carriage ban returns after horse's sudden death in Central Park. CBS News New York. https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/nyc-horse-carriage-ban-central-park-death/
  2. amNewYork Metro. (2026, June 10). NYC lawmakers revive Ryder's Law to ban horse carriage industry as another equine dies in Central Park. amNewYork. https://www.amny.com/nyc-transit/nyc-ryders-law-revived-horse-carriage-industry-death/
  3. amNewYork Metro. (2026). Central Park Conservancy supports ban on horse-drawn carriages, ending neutrality on the animal-rights controversy. amNewYork. https://www.amny.com/nyc-transit/central-park-group-ban-horse-drawn-carriages/
  4. NYCLASS. (2022–present). Ryder's Law: Legislative history and campaign materials. New York City Council. https://www.nyclass.org/
  5. Magee, M. (2026, April 28). The carriage horse fight, reframed. Animal Compassion NYC. https://animalcompassionnyc.com/essay-nyc-carriage-horse-fight.html
← All essays Forward this to your City Council member. Then tell them to vote yes on Ryder's Law.